Mr.Armstrong
Awake and Unafraid
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 12135 | December 12th, 2007 at 07:01pm
there are many reasons why i dont agree with
galmour modeling.
i dont believe your body is a piece of art. Okay everyone has a beautiful
body but when you show it off your body is revieled and is no longer
beautiful cause everyone has seen it.
i also go for the fact that im religous and in my religion its clearly
not allowd for a woman to show her body off or wear clothes so tight
you can see right through her.
i understand that yeah modeling is a good career but its something im
not interested in if it has to do with nudity,or too much skin.
but these are my beliefs
|
alucard.
Jazz Hands
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 389 | December 16th, 2007 at 07:30pm I dont think theres anything wrong with it. Like sure, they're nude.
But to me there is a huge differnce between porn and art.
Art/Glamour Modelling shows how beautiful the human body is.. for example Christina Aguleira posing nude when shes pregnant on a cover of a magazine even my mum (who is a very devoted Christain) thinks that that is beautiful.
Where as porn is just some girl with her legs spread touching herself, which is not at all beautiful, it's disgusting. |
the whack parade.
Demolition Lover
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 19756 | December 27th, 2007 at 02:49pm I think as a whole, it's not cheap or tacky. It depends on how it's distributed. Pin up photography tends to be very tasteful, so I wouldn't say it's wrong. And just like the above person said, when Christina posed naked with her pregnancy, that was very beautiful. It was tasteful, not sleazy. There's a difference between porn and glamour modeling. |
bright lights x x
Really Not Okay
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 715 | December 27th, 2007 at 03:37pm TheVampireToaster:I dont think theres anything wrong with it. Like sure, they're nude.
But to me there is a huge differnce between porn and art.
Art/Glamour Modelling shows how beautiful the human body is.. for example Christina Aguleira posing nude when shes pregnant on a cover of a magazine even my mum (who is a very devoted Christain) thinks that that is beautiful.
Where as porn is just some girl with her legs spread touching herself, which is not at all beautiful, it's disgusting.
agreed 100% |
Murderscene.
Fabulous Killjoy
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 109 | December 28th, 2007 at 05:08am ohh so is glamour modelling um modelling naked? you learn something new everyday!
i'm sort of against it cause i don't think women should use their bodies in that way.
i went to Christina Aguilera's concert and she had a video of her basically naked playing, sure they didn't show anything but yeah. i thought that was a bit...gross. sure some of it is not bad but as i said, i don't think women should use their bodies that way.
that video was basically PG rated porn! |
sweet disposition.
Banned
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 48272 | December 28th, 2007 at 08:21am It's a form of art, and different to porn.
Many people say that the glamour modelling featured in articles such as 'The Sun' or men's magazine is porn, but it's not.
It's just because the article is a bit... cheap and trashy.
|
a_h
Thinking Happy Thoughts
Age: 102
Gender: Female
Posts: 435 | December 28th, 2007 at 01:55pm i see no point..... there is no need for it |
Diana_a7x
Thinking Happy Thoughts
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 456 | December 28th, 2007 at 01:55pm I'm not against it |
