Abortions.
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor  Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | And doesn't start to really develop until later in the biological process. But if you mean how I wouldn't care if a fifth trimester baby was aborted? Ah. Well I personally believe that the concept of life has everything to do with life experience. Even just a peek outside of a mother's woumb is enough to say "Yes, I saw people that love me", where as a fetus never really experiences these things. Scientifically though, Once the brain and heart start working, I wouldn't be ok with abortion, because I understand that not everyone would agree with how I view life, so im sort of meeting everyone halfway. |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade  Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | Seven weeks.  Research shows that at seven weeks, the brain and heart begin working. Abortion is legal into the twenty-fourth week. You are okay with that? And does a newborn not "count as a life," because their only life experience has been being born and becoming a human being by your definition? |
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | A newborn still has experienced life And no, im not, On a personal level I am, but not on what I view should be legal. |
| Viva la Gloria! Joining The Black Parade  Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 191 | I think it should be the mothers own choice! There should be no law banning it, and if you don't like it, just keep to yourself about it. What's worse: killing a tiny clump of cells, or a thirteen-year-old girl having to take care of a REAL child? |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | ALONE.AGAIN.TONITE: Just because you give birth does not mean you have to raise the child. And I also feel the need to say, I have a friend who has a child at fifteen and she is an amazing mother. |
| x-Hail Of Bullets-x Thinking Happy Thoughts  Age: 36 Gender: Female Posts: 483 | All_You_Need_Is_Love: I have to say that I don't really see the 'huge' difference. Both of those things, having sex and crossing the road, are everyday things. If you cross the road, you MIGHT get hit, you MIGHT even get hit so badly that you won't walk ever again (extreme case I know), does that makes it your fault because you chose to cross the road? Because if we base that on your theory with sex, then yes, it is your fault. Which obviously is complete bullshit. I really do feel sorry for anyone who lives their life terrified of what consquences MIGHT happen, because I really think you'll have a limited life experience. Sex is an everyday occurance, it's a wonderful, beautiful thing. I really don't think you should limit yourself on what minute chance you have of getting pregnant if you take precautions. I think saying that you shouldn't have sex at all just because of what MIGHT happen if every precaution you take fails is a very immature and childish statement to make. |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | x-Hail Of Bullets-x: However, if you cross the road at a crosswalk when the walk light is on, the chances of being hit are slim to none. Using a condom when you have sex is only so much protection. What's my theory on sex? That if you aren't mature enough to handle everything that goes along with it you shouldn't have it? If a woman chooses to have sex, she should know there is a chance she will get pregnant. If she chooses to have sex, she chooses to take that chance. If somebody does not feel ready to have a child, they should understand that one of the consequences of having sex is having a child. Even if you do want a child. If somebody knows they never want a child, fine, go get your tubes tied. Or if you do get pregnant, have a C-section and put the child up for adoption. It is a selfish, greedy act to say "yes, I choose to have sex (in the examples we are using, the woman DOES choose to have sex) but I don't wanna have a kid, so I'm gonna decide you aren't worthy of living!!!" |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | Edit: I don't know why my posts keep double posting =/ |
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | Humans are one of two creatures that have sex for pleasure. Obviously, there was a reason. We have gone beyond screwing just to breed. And we don't need more children up for adoption. We are overpopulated as it is. I posted before,In america, one in every four pregnancies are aborted. If america didn't legalize abortion, we would be 1/4th more populated. We are supposed to be having serious overpopulation problems within the next 100 years. If not for abortion, those would be starting earlier. I say better save the masses from starving then a few "things" that haven't even been born in the first place. |
| Viva la Gloria! Joining The Black Parade Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 191 | DIE! DIE! DIE!:Using fact, now that IS the way to win a debate! Excellent point! |
| genresR4losers Motor Baby  Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 817 | ^yeah, but there are some things that you must consider as possibilities that are important to the debate that can't be proven... such as: 1) what are the technological davances as well as medical discoveries that could have been made if the child had been born? 2) by ending abortion you could possibly boost the economy by eventually increasing the work force. 3) it's murder... it's not just a clump of cells, it's a PERSON!!!! granted, it's not a fully functional person, but there are people alive today that are not fully functional, and no one has a problem keeping them alive, so why not these babies? last time i checked, murder was illegal... i think it should stay that way... |
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | 1- Who cares? Leave it up to someone else 2- By ending abortion, you are increasing the unemployment rate, and sending more people on the streets to starve due to serious overpopulation 3-If your definition of a "person" IS a clump of cellls, I guess you win..it's murder. But I think there is more substance to a human being myself. |
| genresR4losers Motor Baby Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 817 | 1- I care... as do millions of other people... but if you think that's insignificant... that's just you... 2- if you choose to be a pessimist... that's you're problem... i seriously feel sorry for you... 3- exactly... that is how i define a person... after all... you're nothing more than one GIGANTIC clump of cells... so... i DO win... it's murder.... |
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | Im not being a pessimist at all, im a realist. More people means larger population. We have an unemployment rate of about 5.7% right now. Trust me, we don't need any more labor force. Do you have any idea how many people are on welfare right now? How many people are homeless, or can hardly scrape by? Now multiply that by 1/4th of the current population every YEAR. I hate to copy and paste but. lmost all growth will take place in the less developed regions, where today’s 5.3 billion population of underdeveloped countries is expected to increase to 7.8 billion in 2050. By contrast, the population of the more developed regions will remain mostly unchanged, at 1.2 billion. The world's population is expected to rise by 40% to 9.1 billion. World population is currently growing by approximately 75 million people per year. Net growth by mid-century is predicted by the United Nations to be 34 million per year in contrast to the roughly 76 million per year that was seen from 2000 to 2005. In 2000-2005, fertility at the world level stood at 2.65 children per woman, about half the level it had in 1950-1955 (5 children per woman). In the medium variant, global fertility is projected to decline further to 2.05 children per woman. During 2005-2050, nine countries are expected to account for half of the world’s projected population increase: India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Bangladesh, Uganda, United States of America, Ethiopia, and China, listed according to the size of their contribution to population growth. Global life expectancy at birth, which is estimated to have risen from 46 years in 1950-1955 to 65 years in 2000-2005, is expected to keep rising to reach 75 years in 2045-2050. In the more developed regions, the projected increase is from 75 years today to 82 years by mid-century. Among the least developed countries, where life expectancy today is just under 50 years, it is expected to be 66 years in 2045-2050. The population of 51 countries or areas, including Germany, Italy, Japan and most of the successor States of the former Soviet Union, is expected to be lower in 2050 than in 2005. During 2005-2050, the net number of international migrants to more developed regions is projected to be 98 million. Because deaths are projected to exceed births in the more developed regions by 73 million during 2005-2050, population growth in those regions will largely be due to international migration. In 2000-2005, net migration in 28 countries either prevented population decline or doubled at least the contribution of natural increase (births minus deaths) to population growth. These countries include Austria, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Qatar, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom.The updated United Nations figures project that the world population will reach 9.2 billion around 2050. This is the medium variant figure which assumes a decrease in average fertility from the present level of 2.5 down to 2. Birth rates are now falling in many developing countries, while the actual populations in many developed countries would fall without immigration. Second of all, I happen to be a lump of cells with thoughts an emotions. an immature fetus has the same functions as a dead man. Abortion is the hault of a possible life, not murder. |
| johnny walker eyes. Demolition Lover  Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 18195 | I personally think nothing is wrong with abortions. And as 'DIE!DIE!DIE!' said, its nothing different from having your period. So no, its slightly different but its not as if you have a full grown fucking baby. Its barely a human. Sure, i find it sad and i pitty anyone who would have to go through something like that but i would rather keep one life, then ruin two. If you get me. If obortion pops into a young mothers head, then they know within themselves that they cant handle it. I acutally think thats something very manly to say. Although, if you are just sleeping with anyone with no protection what to ever, then yes.. you fucking deserve to be tighed down with a baby. But i guess, thats just ruined that baby's chance at life. The baby will be born, and little does it know its mother is a tart. But in circumstances like if you got raped, then obortion is pretty much a 'must do.' |
| johnny walker eyes. Demolition Lover Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 18195 | All_You_Need_Is_Love: That my dear, is an actual baby. If it was at that stage, then an abortion wouldnt be conducted. Its simply to big. An abortion is when the fetus isnt even considered human yet. I think its human after weeks and weeks through the pregnancy. |
| norsis Fabulous Killjoy  Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 147 | If you are suppost to be already a human being and a person inside the mother, why our agecounting begins after the birth? I believe that the woman has a right to decide what she wants to do with her own body. |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | Jess-ay: That is a photograph of a fetus at 17 weeks. As I've said MANY times, abortion is legal through the 24th week. Therefore, that- in your own words- baby could be aborted legally. |
| xXvampchickXx Killjoy  Age: 28 Gender: Female Posts: 9 | I belive it's the mothers choice, its her baby and her body the goverment should butt out. |
| All_You_Need_Is_Love Joining The Black Parade Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 215 | xx_teen_dead_xx: Since you did use the word baby, does that mean you believe it is the mother's choice to kill her baby at any stage? |
Options
Go back to top
Go back to top