Abortions.
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
| Cigarettes And Suicide Bleeding on the Floor Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 1725 | bright lights x x: Umm, hate to burst your bubble, but not everyone who's in a 'standard' (I assume you mean 'stable') relationship can be 'financially prepared on the off chance a baby comes along'. My husband works full time and we don't have many luxuries, but we still can't really afford to have a child - we've got rent, fuel, groceries, car registration, phone, electricity and cable bills to pay, and that's just the stuff I can think of off the top of my head. Yeah, it might not sound like much, because when you live with your parents and they're buying everything for you (things like food, that you would think are pretty cheap), you have absolutely no concept of what money is coming into the house, and what money is going out on certain things. For instance, our rent is around 35% of his weekly income - that's a massive slice. Then we have to buy groceries, and being pregnant, there are certain things like fresh fruit and vegetables that I have to include in my diet - and with the drought going on, fresh produce prices are through the roof, so there's another 25% of his weekly pay on food - and we're lucky if we manage to stretch our budget to include meat for every night of the week - sometimes we have to go without because it's too expensive, and my iron levels are through the floor (which is really bad for a developing baby). Then come the bills - they never stop, and they need to paid right now, so there's usually another 30% of our income on that stuff - which leaves us no money to save, and no money to buy things for the baby. That's just an example, but hey, not every married couple in the world lives off two incomes (for that matter, I got fired from my job when my boss found out I was pregnant - their insurance didn't cover pregnant employees so if I'd hurt myself or something, they would have been liable and they had to let me go), and not every husband in the world is a lawyer or doctor or in some other highly-paid position. And the cost of living goes up and up all the time - housing prices, food prices, etc etc.. we can't seem to get ahead. And I think it's absolutely ridiculous that you would suggest a family member take up the burden of somebody else's responsibility. As Fezzik said, her parents are looking forward to retirement and spending time together, child-free, for the first time in many years, and they deserve that. My parents are excited about becoming grandparents, but they don't want a baby in their house, interrupting their sleep, draining their bank accounts, etc. It's my responsibility and, although I'm happy to take it on, a lot of people aren't and neither they nor their parents should be forced to do so - it impacts on lives so much more than what you realise. My parents have already raised two kids to adulthood, it's time for them to have their lives back and enjoy being a couple instead of being parents. I'd never ask them to care for a child that isn't theirs, unless it was babysitting for a couple of hours. |
| bright lights x x Really Not Okay Age: 28 Gender: Female Posts: 715 | there are 12 year olds being raped out there i can fully understand why they might want an abortion for that but theres no reason for an abortion if you have the money to support the child. if you dont then you shouldnt really take the chance untill you feel comfertable (sp) in the situation. im not trying to tell anyone how to live there life or w/e by no means. its just my opion. please do not get mad at me for this. |
| eepshyes Shotgun Sinner Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 7323 | bright lights x x: You say that now, until it actually happens to you. A lot of people think this way. |
| Alx_Aoide Fabulous Killjoy Age: 33 Gender: Female Posts: 113 | MCR Rocks: But then again, think about all the other kids who are now currently in foster homes in the United States and in orphanages worldwide. There's no guarantee that the mother will be able to find her child a suitable home. And like you said, being pregnant is very hard on the body. Because of that, it should be a woman's choice whether or not she wants to go through nine months of pain just so she has to give the baby up at the end of it. |
| bright lights x x Really Not Okay Age: 28 Gender: Female Posts: 715 | And I think it's absolutely ridiculous that you would suggest a family member take up the burden of somebody else's responsibility. As Fezzik said, her parents are looking forward to retirement and spending time together, child-free, for the first time in many years, and they deserve that. My parents are excited about becoming grandparents, but they don't want a baby in their house, interrupting their sleep, draining their bank accounts, etc. It's my responsibility and, although I'm happy to take it on, a lot of people aren't and neither they nor their parents should be forced to do so - it impacts on lives so much more than what you realise. My parents have already raised two kids to adulthood, it's time for them to have their lives back and enjoy being a couple instead of being parents. I'd never ask them to care for a child that isn't theirs, unless it was babysitting for a couple of hours. again i see what you mean. but my parents are differnt theyd be happy for me that i chose to keep and raise it im not trying to say that i would hand it compleltly over to mom and dad. cause i wouldnt im saying if i needed someone to look after it while i was in school they would offer although it wouldnt be all that good for the baby it would be raised well untill i was out of school. but i wouldnt have to worry about that. |
| bright lights x x Really Not Okay Age: 28 Gender: Female Posts: 715 | Audrey Hepburn.: yes true but then again i trust myself |
| Alx_Aoide Fabulous Killjoy Age: 33 Gender: Female Posts: 113 | Oops...double post. |
| Cigarettes And Suicide Bleeding on the Floor Age: 35 Gender: Female Posts: 1725 | MCR Rocks:No, I agree with Fezzik. Obviously the adoption system isn't working, because orphanages and foster homes are overflowing with unwanted children who probably will never be adopted, and this situation will only get worse as medical technology advances. Infertile couples don't want other people's children, they want their own, and IVF treatments etc are becoming so advanced that soon no couple on earth will be infertile, unless of course they can't afford the procedures (and, if they can't afford IVF or sperm/egg donors etc, then according to government legislation, they cannot afford to adopt a child either). Soon everyone, providing they can pay for it, will be able to have their own flesh and blood growing inside them with medical assistance, and children in foster homes will be ignored completely because there's no need for them to be given to a childless couple. In addition to that, people's liberal attitudes and 'save the world' philosophies mean Western orphans/foster kids are being ignored by childless couples in favour of 'those poor little' African and Asian children, who people think are so much worse off than an American or Australian orphan. Not every child who is given up for adoption finds a home - I know of people who were given up by their parents and left to rot in an orphanage until they turned 16 and were thrown out onto the street with no job, no money, and no way of knowing how to survive. If the adoption system worked so well, if there really were that many couples willing to adopt, there'd be hardly any kids in foster care - think about it, if it worked so well, they'd all be tucked up in great new homes with loving new parents, wouldn't they? Obviously they're not, so the system is by no means as good as you'd like to think it is. And not only is being pregnant for nine months (technically, 10 months - 40 weeks) is extremely hard on the body (and oh, I can tell you all about it, being 38 weeks pregnant), but it's extremely hard on the mind as well. I've lost my job, tolerated scornful, disapproving looks from complete strangers, lost pretty much all my friends because I'm 'no fun' anymore, I feel sick all the time, my back hurts, my feet, legs and hands are swollen, had to deal with the inevitable 'You're throwing your life away, having a baby so young' comments from friends, family and complete strangers, had several health scares (both mine and the baby's)... the list goes on. And I'll be damned if I've gone through all of that for pretty much nothing - or, not nothing... damned if a person would go through all of that, only to hand their baby over to someone and then spend the rest of their life wondering what happened to that child. |
| Fezzik Salute You in Your Grave Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 2748 | ^Exactly. I mean, I could (almost) understand having a woman go through all of that and carry a child to term if I thought for a moment that the embryo she'd abort would in some way no the difference, but all scientific evidence shows it doesn't. No brain function, feeling no pain - it's just a clump of cells at the point it would be aborted, far more a parasite than human. Yes, it might develop into a living breathing person one day, if it's not miscarried (which, as Cigarettes and Suicide pointed out, is quite likely in the first trimester), but why should an already fully developed woman have to throw her life into chaos so that it might, if she doesn't want to? |
| druscilla. Bleeding on the Floor Age: 34 Gender: Female Posts: 1671 | MCR Rocks: You make it sound like there are a shortage of children to be adopted. There aren't. If somebody gets an abortion it is not going to make one of the children that is currently alive and waiting to be adopted disappear. Why don't you worry about the children who actually exist? |
| UndyingSoul. Really Not Okay Age: 32 Gender: Female Posts: 722 | ^^ I must say that I kind of agree. We should worry about the kids who are already waiting for parents above the kids that arent even born yet. |
| graveyardXray Killjoy Age: - Gender: - Posts: 20 | Abortion is good. It might save another kid from going into a Orphanage.Or save the women from going poor. If a women wants a abortion she should not be stopped by the government. |
| Carrie White Thinking Happy Thoughts Age: 29 Gender: Female Posts: 416 | I'm not against abortion, I'm saying that a woman should take responsibility for what has happened. if the woman was raped or she cant have a child for various reasons, fine get a abortion, i cant stop you. but i just dont think its fair that a woman that is fully able to have a kid shouldn't get a abortion because 'it'll interfere in my life'. i hate (actually i love) to break this to you, but EVERYTHING you do interferes with your life. and what about emotional trauma? wouldn't a woman feel bad after doing this. i mean this would affect your emotional health, guilt turns to depression, depression over a long period is chronic depression and is treated with anti depression. yea a woman may not feel guilt about getting a abortion but many woman would. in MY MIND (NOT YOURS) i think that if a woman doesn't feel even a little guilt shes heartless. |
| Carrie White Thinking Happy Thoughts Age: 29 Gender: Female Posts: 416 | and no i'm not saying that every woman in the world is going to get chronic depression cause she had a abortion. BUT it is a POSSIBLITY |
| Fezzik Salute You in Your Grave Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 2748 | MCR Rocks: Why should a woman have to take responsibility for, say, her birth control failing? And how should someone considered so irresponsible be expected to take on the responsibility of another human life? And how is it fair that an unconscious embryo's life, which is only potential, should take precedent over a fully-developed woman's? |
| oo_mitch05_oo Killjoy Age: 29 Gender: Female Posts: 34 | murder is considered to be a crime, and in abortion, a child is being killed so it's considered to be mureder. so why should the government legalize a crime? if it's the women's fault that she got pregnant then she should take the responsibility of having a child. it's up to her how she would support the child. the women, also the men, should consider the consequences of their actions. THINK BEFORE YOU ACT! but some also has a point about the incest or rape. this is the men's fault. the women suffer from their pleasures! |
| eepshyes Shotgun Sinner Age: - Gender: Female Posts: 7323 | oo_mitch05_oo: Like Fezzik said, what if her birth control failed? She did take action not to get pregnant. And a growing embryo is not a child. It has not taken a breath, nor is it conscious of it's surroundings. |
| MrRandomGuy Fabulous Killjoy Age: 35 Gender: Male Posts: 128 | Abortions should be limited to whenever there is a clear and present danger to the mother and in emergancies. What about rape? Can you honestly sit there and tell me the psychological, emotional, and physical pain would go away if the mother had the baby aborted? You can't because the pain would remain with or without the child and it would take years of therapy for all of it to go away. |
| Casimir Pulaski Day Shotgun Sinner Age: 91 Gender: Female Posts: 8861 | bright lights x x: Not everybodies parents are your parents. I respect your opinion that you would never have sex without knowing that you have the possibility of becoming pregnant and having a child. Also, if you did, you wouldn't have an abortion. But not everybody is in the same circumstance as you. Just because you choose to live your life a certain way, does not mean you have ANY RIGHT to impose your life on theirs. You don't have to have an abortion, but there are plenty of other people who would benefit greatly from it. |
| DIE! DIE! DIE! Bleeding on the Floor Age: 31 Gender: Female Posts: 1067 | oo_mitch05_oo: Read some pages back. We have already covered and defeated your whole point. |
Options
Go back to top
Go back to top
