Don't have an account? Create one!

Necrophilia

AuthorMessage
MissMalice
Killjoy
MissMalice
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 4
January 17th, 2007 at 07:56pm
Honestly, I think necrophila isn't disgusting at all. Infact, it even turns me on a little. But the thing is, you people are so judgemental about it. The only way it would be disrespectful and or wrong is if you don't exaclty have the consent from the person who died. As long as you have the consent, I say, GO FOR IT! People who don't like it, don't knock others for it and just forget about it. Different people have different attractions. But again, some people like anal, others like strap-ons, and then there is necrophila. It all depends on what you prefer.
Innamorata
Awake and Unafraid
Innamorata
Age: 33
Gender: Female
Posts: 11838
January 20th, 2007 at 09:59pm
sally; dr. pepper:
I think it's repulsive and that people only with mental illnesses do this act. Medication is the key to this in my oppinion.


And exactly what medication would be made for this 'fetish'? If there is medication for necrophilia, then there should be medications for other fetishes.

Such as bondage, anal, auxiliary intercourse (sexual climax achieved by moving the erect penis back and forth in the armpit. Also known as bag piping), bears (attraction to hairy men), capnolagnia (arousal to one who smokes), castration play (arousal to thoughts or acts of castration), CP ( Coropal Punishment), cross dressing, dermagraphism (attraction for skin abrasions made by pinching, biting and sucking), etc.

If medication WAS the answer to outlaw necrophilia then would basically all fetishes that are condone in be chosen to also be medicated? Would all medication in that case be prescribed to the human race?
aymeelovesmychem
Joining The Black Parade
aymeelovesmychem
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 207
January 21st, 2007 at 06:55am
this is well nasty dude , why would someone want to have sex with someone who died ? One the person who has died would be riddled with bugs etc and it would pass onto the other person .

Who would want to do that sorry if that was mean but its pretty sick
aymee x
Quinn Allman
Salute You in Your Grave
Quinn Allman
Age: -
Gender: -
Posts: 3374
January 21st, 2007 at 11:03am
I don't like Necrophilia. In my opinion it's gross and creepy. Mostly gross. People can do what they want but I will never ever turn to that.
Alex DeLarge.
Motor Baby
Alex DeLarge.
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 779
January 21st, 2007 at 03:25pm
bloodredruby69:
This thread is a very touchy one - it could easily dissolve into spam / chaos.
We'll have to be careful to keep it scrupulously on topic, ne?
-------------------------------

Necrophillia is a fetish, not much different than a foot fetish, a leather fetish,
a slave fetish, or, really, any other fetish out there.

The fact that the person is no longer alive is really not the issue here.
In these days of sex toys, blow up dolls, and do-it-yourselfers,
there really doesn't have to be a second partner for there to be sex.

Since the person is already dead, I don't see any harm in it.
As long as the person speaks to whoever is responsible for the body
and gains their consent, I don't have any problems with it.


Really, I agree with you here. What gets one person off isn't the same for everyone. Anyone can say, "Ew, foot fetishes are nasty," or "Eww,bondage is nasty." You don't know how it is, because you're not the person with the fetish. A necrophiliac (that's the correct term, right?) probably already feels shame for their fetish, seeing as how there are those out there who would be constantly berating them for it, there's never anyone sticking up for them. As long as things stay safe, healthy and clean, no one can really say anything about it, because, in all actuality, it's no one else's business but the ones (or one, in this case) participating.
bloodredruby69
Banned
bloodredruby69
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 8293
January 21st, 2007 at 03:55pm
^It's nice to see someone with an open mind here. ^^

To everyone who states that it is;
Gross.
Nasty.
Disgusting.
Wrong.
Creepy.
Sick.
Perverted.
etc,

I haven't seen a SINGLE ONE of you actually back up those statements.
All I've seen from the ones who post those types of things are personal
opinions and bias as well as unsupported arguments, and fairly inflexible minds.

Please, support what you say, rather than just regurgitating a conviction
that has been drilled into you by society or your guardians.
snow at christmas.
Crash Queen
snow at christmas.
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 31690
January 21st, 2007 at 03:59pm
I don't find it appealing at all, but just so long as it's not interfering with the lives of others who are not dead, I don't see why it's so awful. It's a personal choice issue, I guess.
wilson.
Shotgun Sinner
wilson.
Age: -
Gender: -
Posts: 9092
January 21st, 2007 at 04:06pm
I'm not saying it's a truly great thing to do, seeing as you can easily get an infection etc etc, but if you gain consent from the person before they die or from the person who is responsible for the body, you can do it. This world is full of twisted pleasures, and this qualifies, but that doesn't mean it should be banned. Whatever floats your boat, really, as long as you get the consent from the deceased before they're dead or their caretaker once they're dead. The caretaker should take into account what the deceased was like before they died, what they wanted, who they were, their beliefs, etc. If the deceased person in question voiced anti-necrophilia opinions before their death, then you should respect their wishes. If you go against what the deceadant or the caretaker want, then I see no problem for the person committing the act to be charged. But that's only if you wanted to commit necrophilia and the deceadant/caretaker said no, not if they wanted it to occur and you rejected the offer. I'm not sure how much sense I'm making, or if I've got points buried in here somewhere, but you catch my drift.

I hope.
samantha connolly
In The Murder Scene
samantha connolly
Age: 32
Gender: Female
Posts: 24519
January 21st, 2007 at 04:08pm
Since Ruby asked for you us to back up our statements if we thought it was creepy, I'll go right ahead with my argument.

Sex, to me, is not purely for orgasm, it's for the emotional connection between human beings. Even one-noight stands are, to me, two people coming together to show at least some type of lust for eachother; some type of emotion. In necrophilia, there;s obviouslly no soul in the body, there's nothing for the dead to feel, so it's pure sexual output. But, you say, Samantha, you're okay with masturbation, and that's only for one person, right? And here I back that up again; in masturbation, we're not directly involving another person. In necrophilia, you are involving that other person, in a very much more direct way.
Also, I'm pretty sure it's illegal, but I tried to leave that outfor the sake of argument.
I also have a very religious standpoint on it, but again, left that out for the sake of argument.
bloodredruby69
Banned
bloodredruby69
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 8293
January 21st, 2007 at 04:19pm
Taylor - I'm not all gung - ho for the gusto on this topic either,
but I feel that every person should have the freedom to choose what they like
and what "gets them off", provided, of course, that it doesn't cross another person's right to their own choices.

See, that is where we differ on opinion, Sam.
I think that what you describe as "sex" I would describe as "making love",
as I think that sex and making love are two totally different opperations,
which is how I can come to my opinion that sex with a corpse is not wrong.

BTW - THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU for actually supporting your ideas. <3

I can see how it would be seen as wrong from a religious standpoint,
and may be seen as disrespectful or as desecration of the dead.
But I also believe that, under the right circumstances, it should be perfectly acceptable.

I'm not religious, by any stretch, but because I often argue against
statements that have a firm religious standpoint, I have learned to use
logic and personal perception to try and show another side of the argument.

That being said, Sam, if there is no soul in the body, is the body still the possession of the soul?
If I were to comment on the body-soul relationship, I would think that the body
is just a container, and when that container is empty, what happens to it shouldn't
be particularly important, because the person themself is no longer in that body.

If that makes any sense whatsoever.
BeastxInxRepose
S/C/A/R/E/C/R/O/W
BeastxInxRepose
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 153610
January 21st, 2007 at 05:45pm
The problem that I have necrophilia, isn't because it's disrespectful, or "disgusting," or that that's what pleases you and "gets you off," etc. but the simple fact that it's a rotting, decomposing corpse!
Quinn Allman
Salute You in Your Grave
Quinn Allman
Age: -
Gender: -
Posts: 3374
January 21st, 2007 at 07:37pm
bloodredruby69:
^It's nice to see someone with an open mind here. ^^

To everyone who states that it is;
Gross.
Nasty.
Disgusting.
Wrong.
Creepy.
Sick.
Perverted.
etc,

I haven't seen a SINGLE ONE of you actually back up those statements.
All I've seen from the ones who post those types of things are personal
opinions and bias as well as unsupported arguments, and fairly inflexible minds.

Please, support what you say, rather than just regurgitating a conviction
that has been drilled into you by society or your guardians.


I don't mean to be close minded or to sound stuck up if I do. I was just stating my opinion in short terms. I don't follow what my guardians do or think, I have my own thoughts and feelings on things. People can do whatever they want that makes them happy. People SHOULD be able to do what they want, but keep it on a certain level and not let it get out of control (I mean this on almost anything). Hard to explain but if you get what I'm saying, then okay. I don't want to turn this into an argument so I'm going to finish up what I have to say.

Even if I am not into necrophilia, I wouldn't go out of my way to stop something that somebody else is into. I hope what I said does not sound wrong or dumb I just don't want to be thought of as close minded and I hope I explained myself.
bloodredruby69
Banned
bloodredruby69
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 8293
January 21st, 2007 at 08:53pm
No, you answer was exactly what I was hoping to provoke with my post.

The fact is, when you just state a very short, closed opinion on the topic,
not only do you sound more narrow minded, but it kills the discussion.
Opinions are fine, but just a short opinion and no discussion is, basically, spam.

What about necrophillia do YOU find to be gross or creepy?
Quinn Allman
Salute You in Your Grave
Quinn Allman
Age: -
Gender: -
Posts: 3374
January 21st, 2007 at 09:03pm
bloodredruby69:
No, you answer was exactly what I was hoping to provoke with my post.

The fact is, when you just state a very short, closed opinion on the topic,
not only do you sound more narrow minded, but it kills the discussion.
Opinions are fine, but just a short opinion and no discussion is, basically, spam.

What about necrophillia do YOU find to be gross or creepy?


Well, to ME, it's the whole arousal of corpses and that some people actually have encounters with them. To me, that is...not arousing. I'm trying to find the nicest way to state my opinion.
Tara Scene
Motor Baby
Tara Scene
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 939
January 21st, 2007 at 09:09pm
I really dont have a big problem with it if the person had consent I just find it kind of disgusting because its probably a rottign corpse
bloodredruby69
Banned
bloodredruby69
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 8293
January 21st, 2007 at 09:25pm
Alex - I appreciate you trying. I really do. Wink

The same can be said about any other fetish you don't share though.
I'm not saying you have to approach the topic as though you yourself had to "bang a corpse",
I'm just trying to point out that it doesn't have to be a bad thing.
In actuallity, it's no different than having sex with a blow up doll.
The doll is just a lot more fleshy, and was once alive.

Tara - Rotting?
I would have to say rarely.
Usually the most accessable corpses are those in the coroners office,
or at the mortuary, and people don't like to leave their dead unburied long.
Though, rot could be a problem were the person a grave robber,
which is something I do not agree with.
Catharsis
Jazz Hands
Catharsis
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 261
January 21st, 2007 at 10:23pm
While i personally wouldn't engage in the act, i don't see anything wrong with others doing so.
The only issue i see with it is consent, just like with those who are living consent is necessary before engaging in such acts, it should also be with the deceased. While i am not exactly sure how this consent process could work, maybe through wills etc i think it would be important to most people

I don't believe that just because as individual gets satisfaction out of the act means that they have a mental disorder and need to be locked up or medicated. There are numerous reasons why they may do it. Some reasons expressed on websites include things such as individuals being severely sexually abused and feel as though that is the only way they can gain sexual gratification and others simply want to experience something different.
Each individual person on the planet is exactly that, individual, and gets gratification, both sexual and non-sexual out of things which others may think are completely abnormal, so who are we to judge what another person genetic information and socialisation process turned them into.

As long as no one is getting murdered for it and it is all consensual then why not.

Besides it has even become a growing business in some parts of the world with companies which sell sex toys etc also selling corpses which can be costum made to the persons liking. So it must be somewhat of a growing trend. We already have a national organ donor service, in years to come we might have a corpse donor service where corpses can be donated to a necrophiliac society.
ageha.
Bulletproof Heart
ageha.
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 25049
January 22nd, 2007 at 10:54am
MetalliDeth:
Some people just have serioius issues if they actually think this would be normal in the future.


I think that necrophilia will be accepted in the future, but does that give me mental issues? No. Because it's my opinion on the certain topic, and its different from yours.
If a person says that they are against homosexual marriages, and you're for it, would you say that the person has serious mental issues just for saying that they are not okay with gays marrying?

Anyhow.
I find the giving consent thing pretty tricky.
Say, if a woman dies, and a man, who has always been in love with the woman, but was unable to have a relationship, has sex with the woman's corpse without her consent. People would of course use this argument to put the man in jail or something, but what if the man fakes a document saying that the woman gives her consent for her body being used after her death?
Anything is possible these days.
Quinn Allman
Salute You in Your Grave
Quinn Allman
Age: -
Gender: -
Posts: 3374
January 22nd, 2007 at 04:35pm
Mr Fitzwilliam Darcy:

Anything is possible these days.


Very true
v e n g e a n c e
Salute You in Your Grave
v e n g e a n c e
Age: 31
Gender: Female
Posts: 2566
January 22nd, 2007 at 11:53pm
bloodredruby69:
This thread is a very touchy one - it could easily dissolve into spam / chaos.
We'll have to be careful to keep it scrupulously on topic, ne?
-------------------------------

Necrophillia is a fetish, not much different than a foot fetish, a leather fetish,
a slave fetish, or, really, any other fetish out there.

The fact that the person is no longer alive is really not the issue here.
In these days of sex toys, blow up dolls, and do-it-yourselfers,
there really doesn't have to be a second partner for there to be sex.

Since the person is already dead, I don't see any harm in it.
As long as the person speaks to whoever is responsible for the body
and gains their consent, I don't have any problems with it.


i'd have to agree with that.